Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100 +184%
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
1344
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy