Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M +116%
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
1152
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy