Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +4736%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy