NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
+753%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G94
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
