Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +1260%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy