Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +69%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1404 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
134.8GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
384 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1244 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy