Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +21%
1.405 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4000M
94
Quadro M2000M +40%
132
OctaneBench
Quadro K4000M
20
Quadro M2000M +70%
34
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM107
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy