CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
Lower TDP (108W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+424%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
VS
Arctic Sound 1T
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
6144
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Board Design
108W
TDP
350W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
2
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
4
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
5
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
6
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
7
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
8
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
9
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
10
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy