Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
Lower TDP (108W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +424%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
6144
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
350W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy