Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 32GB VRAM Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB +58%
3.333 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
204.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
56
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.666 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.333 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.667 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA10B
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

108W
TDP
40W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy