Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 108W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G71
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy