Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1124MHz vs 784MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +144%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM107
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy