Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 108W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2006
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
NV43
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
NVS440 NPB
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy