Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +67%
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
Tesla K20c +71%
55
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
2496
112
TMUs
208
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK110
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy