Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition +195%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
51W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy