Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition +188%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
576
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy