NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Lower TDP (108W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+2%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1344
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
108W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
