NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+268%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
1536
Shading Units
3328
128
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
