NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+518%
13.41 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
-
SM Count
48
1536
Shading Units
3840
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
