Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +7433%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
1536
Shading Units
19456
128
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy