Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +1986%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
13312
128
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy