Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +154%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy