Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 +2611%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
32
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

122W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy