Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 +3576%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
32
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

122W
TDP
42W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy