Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 +369%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy