Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 +151%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K5000 +72%
31
Quadro K620M
18
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy