Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 10 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M +395%
1.615 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK107
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy