Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M +393%
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF106
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy