NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+49%
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5100M
1273
Quadro K5200
+62%
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5100M
507
Quadro K5200
+85%
941
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK110B
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
