Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1036MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M +11%
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
695 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM206
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy