Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1114MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +188%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM200
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy