Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K510M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K510M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K510M +326%
0.341 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
19.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.556 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
14.22 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
341.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
14.22 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy