Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 172% (2100MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +3350%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
14592
192
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
760W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
146 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy