Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 95% (1500MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +245%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy