Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (1700MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +1247%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
14080
192
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy