Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +55%
3.553 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1536
192
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy