NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (1700MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+536%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
6656
192
TMUs
416
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
