NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+384%
3.553 TFLOPS
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
