NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 189W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+471%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
2304
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
189W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
