NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (1645MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
+255%
12.63 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro P6000
+329%
8898
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro P6000
+340%
4147
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro P6000
+181%
825
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
2304
Shading Units
3840
192
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
