Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +7459%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy