Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +862%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G80
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy