Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1124MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +311%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy