NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+63%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1536
192
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
122W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
