Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1480MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +17%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy