Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1215MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +14%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P3000 Mobile
3.11 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200 +7%
293
Quadro P3000 Mobile
272
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1088 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
2304
Shading Units
1280
192
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy