NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (1545MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
+100%
7.119 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro RTX 4000
+279%
7853
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro RTX 4000
+292%
3696
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
2304
Shading Units
2304
192
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
