NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 133% (1800MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI60
+315%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1024GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.373 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
Vega 20
-
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
