Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 73% (1335MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +53%
5.468 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
RTX A500 Embedded +26%
2628

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net