Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +1088%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy