Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (41W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M +25%
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy